BCSF
Price
$16.29
Change
-$0.11 (-0.67%)
Updated
May 21, 09:58 AM (EDT)
78 days until earnings call
MFIC
Price
$15.68
Change
+$0.10 (+0.64%)
Updated
May 21, 10:13 AM (EDT)
163 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCSF vs MFIC

Header iconBCSF vs MFIC Comparison
Open Charts BCSF vs MFICBanner chart's image
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
Price$16.29
Change-$0.11 (-0.67%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
MidCap Financial Investment
Price$15.68
Change+$0.10 (+0.64%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BCSF vs MFIC Comparison Chart

Loading...

BCSFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
MFICDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BCSF vs. MFIC commentary
May 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCSF is a Hold and MFIC is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 21, 2024
Stock price -- (BCSF: $16.43 vs. MFIC: $15.49)
Brand notoriety: BCSF and MFIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCSF: 73% vs. MFIC: 72%
Market capitalization -- BCSF: $1B vs. MFIC: $970.97M
BCSF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1B. MFIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $970.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMFIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MFIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCSF is a better buy in the long-term than MFIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFIC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFIC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCSF is a better buy in the short-term than MFIC.

Price Growth

BCSF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.50% price change this week, while MFIC (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCSF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.

MFIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.55% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BCSF with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MFIC with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCSF($1B) and MFIC($971M) have the same market capitalization . MFIC (8.18) and BCSF (8.14) have similar P/E ratio . MFIC YTD gains are higher at: 16.213 vs. BCSF (12.178). BCSF has more cash in the bank: 43M vs. MFIC (16.5M). BCSF has less debt than MFIC: BCSF (1.26B) vs MFIC (1.46B). BCSF (138M) and MFIC (133M) have equivalent revenues.
BCSFMFICBCSF / MFIC
Capitalization1B971M103%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.17816.21375%
P/E Ratio8.148.18100%
Revenue138M133M104%
Total Cash43M16.5M261%
Total Debt1.26B1.46B86%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFIC: Fundamental Ratings
MFIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
69
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSFMFIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCSFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
MFICDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIDNX10.570.06
+0.57%
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val I
PIERX26.400.10
+0.38%
Putnam International Equity R
JASCX37.650.07
+0.19%
James Small Cap
HSCSX26.630.04
+0.15%
Homestead Small Company Stock
ERSMX32.310.01
+0.03%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R

BCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCSF has been loosely correlated with MFIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCSF jumps, then MFIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCSF
1D Price
Change %
BCSF100%
+0.74%
MFIC - BCSF
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
NXDT - BCSF
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
GSBD - BCSF
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
CGBD - BCSF
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
BBDC - BCSF
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
More

MFIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFIC has been closely correlated with CGBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFIC jumps, then CGBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFIC
1D Price
Change %
MFIC100%
-0.19%
CGBD - MFIC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
SLRC - MFIC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
GSBD - MFIC
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
ARCC - MFIC
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
NMFC - MFIC
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
More