BBDC
Price
$9.82
Change
-$0.02 (-0.20%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
78 days until earnings call
BCSF
Price
$16.39
Change
-$0.03 (-0.18%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
78 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BBDC vs BCSF

Header iconBBDC vs BCSF Comparison
Open Charts BBDC vs BCSFBanner chart's image
Barings BDC
Price$9.82
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
Volume$132.33K
CapitalizationN/A
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
Price$16.39
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
Volume$106.72K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BBDC vs BCSF Comparison Chart

Loading...

BBDCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
BCSFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BBDC vs. BCSF commentary
May 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBDC is a Hold and BCSF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 21, 2024
Stock price -- (BBDC: $9.84 vs. BCSF: $16.43)
Brand notoriety: BBDC and BCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBDC: 44% vs. BCSF: 73%
Market capitalization -- BBDC: $979M vs. BCSF: $1B
BBDC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $979M. BCSF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBDC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBCSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BBDC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BCSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCSF is a better buy in the long-term than BBDC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBDC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBDC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BCSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BBDC and BCSF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BBDC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.23% price change this week, while BCSF (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBDC is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.

BCSF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.55% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BBDC with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BCSF with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCSF($1B) and BBDC($979M) have the same market capitalization . BCSF has higher P/E ratio than BBDC: BCSF (8.14) vs BBDC (7.69). BBDC YTD gains are higher at: 17.804 vs. BCSF (12.178). BBDC has more cash in the bank: 57.2M vs. BCSF (43M). BCSF has less debt than BBDC: BCSF (1.26B) vs BBDC (1.44B). BBDC (140M) and BCSF (138M) have equivalent revenues.
BBDCBCSFBBDC / BCSF
Capitalization979M1B98%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.80412.178146%
P/E Ratio7.698.1495%
Revenue140M138M101%
Total Cash57.2M43M133%
Total Debt1.44B1.26B115%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBDC: Fundamental Ratings
BBDC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31
SMR RATING
1..100
22
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBDCBCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BBDCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
BCSFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIDNX10.570.06
+0.57%
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val I
PIERX26.400.10
+0.38%
Putnam International Equity R
JASCX37.650.07
+0.19%
James Small Cap
HSCSX26.630.04
+0.15%
Homestead Small Company Stock
ERSMX32.310.01
+0.03%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R

BCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCSF has been loosely correlated with MFIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCSF jumps, then MFIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCSF
1D Price
Change %
BCSF100%
+0.74%
MFIC - BCSF
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
NXDT - BCSF
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
GSBD - BCSF
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
CGBD - BCSF
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
BBDC - BCSF
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
More