Loading...
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NCSM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSAC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
USAC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
NCSM (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -1.52% price change this week, while USAC (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -3.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.63%.
NCSM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2024.
USAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2024.
The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
NCSM | USAC | NCSM / USAC | |
Capitalization | 39.1M | 2.78B | 1% |
EBITDA | 1.86M | 486M | 0% |
Gain YTD | 1.401 | 8.976 | 16% |
P/E Ratio | 55.25 | 134.80 | 41% |
Revenue | 142M | 846M | 17% |
Total Cash | 16.7M | 11K | 151,818% |
Total Debt | 13.5M | 2.35B | 1% |
NCSM | USAC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
USAC's Valuation (12) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCSM (57). This means that USAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCSM’s over the last 12 months.
USAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCSM (100). This means that USAC’s stock grew significantly faster than NCSM’s over the last 12 months.
USAC's SMR Rating (80) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as NCSM (91). This means that USAC’s stock grew similarly to NCSM’s over the last 12 months.
NCSM's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as USAC (53). This means that NCSM’s stock grew similarly to USAC’s over the last 12 months.
NCSM's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USAC (99). This means that NCSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than USAC’s over the last 12 months.
USAC | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NCSM and NOA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCSM and NOA's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NCSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NCSM | 100% | -0.28% | ||
NOA - NCSM | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
NESR - NCSM | 25% Poorly correlated | +3.09% | ||
WTTR - NCSM | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
VAL - NCSM | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
USAC - NCSM | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USAC has been loosely correlated with WTTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USAC jumps, then WTTR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
USAC | 100% | +0.04% | ||
WTTR - USAC | 48% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
NESR - USAC | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.09% | ||
TTI - USAC | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
AROC - USAC | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
DNOW - USAC | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
More |