LGHL
Price
$0.47
Change
-$0.01 (-2.08%)
Updated
May 17, 6:59 PM EST
NDAQ
Price
$62.76
Change
+$0.55 (+0.88%)
Updated
May 17, 6:59 PM EST
58 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LGHL vs NDAQ

Header iconLGHL vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts LGHL vs NDAQBanner chart's image
Lion Group Holding
Price$0.47
Change-$0.01 (-2.08%)
Volume$263.49K
CapitalizationN/A
Nasdaq
Price$62.76
Change+$0.55 (+0.88%)
Volume$1.19M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
LGHL vs NDAQ Comparison Chart

Loading...

LGHLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
NDAQDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
LGHL vs. NDAQ commentary
May 20, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGHL is a Hold and NDAQ is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 20, 2024
Stock price -- (LGHL: $0.47 vs. NDAQ: $62.76)
Brand notoriety: LGHL and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGHL: 157% vs. NDAQ: 65%
Market capitalization -- LGHL: $3.14M vs. NDAQ: $36.33B
LGHL [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.14M. NDAQ’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $36.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LGHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the long-term than LGHL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGHL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGHL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the short-term than LGHL.

Price Growth

LGHL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +3.04% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +3.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +10.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15898.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

LGHL is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2022.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+10.16% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for LGHL with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for NDAQ with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NDAQ($36.3B) has a higher market cap than LGHL($3.14M). NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: 8.345 vs. LGHL (-64.889). NDAQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2B vs. LGHL (-28.94M). NDAQ has more cash in the bank: 641M vs. LGHL (11.2M). LGHL has less debt than NDAQ: LGHL (5.39M) vs NDAQ (10.9B). NDAQ has higher revenues than LGHL: NDAQ (6.06B) vs LGHL (-2.48M).
LGHLNDAQLGHL / NDAQ
Capitalization3.14M36.3B0%
EBITDA-28.94M2B-1%
Gain YTD-64.8898.345-778%
P/E RatioN/A29.93-
Revenue-2.48M6.06B-0%
Total Cash11.2M641M2%
Total Debt5.39M10.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15
SMR RATING
1..100
64
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
27
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGHLNDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LGHLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
NDAQDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SXTP0.22N/A
+0.85%
60 Degrees Pharmaceuticals
CAVA77.28-0.04
-0.05%
CAVA Group
YORW38.38-0.20
-0.52%
York Water Company
NB2.22-0.05
-2.20%
NioCorp Developments Ltd
RCKT22.62-0.78
-3.33%
Rocket Pharmaceuticals

LGHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGHL and TOP have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGHL and TOP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGHL
1D Price
Change %
LGHL100%
-1.41%
TOP - LGHL
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
MEGL - LGHL
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.80%
TREE - LGHL
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
AGBA - LGHL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
NDAQ - LGHL
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
More

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been loosely correlated with ICE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then ICE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
+0.85%
ICE - NDAQ
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
MCO - NDAQ
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
SPGI - NDAQ
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
FDS - NDAQ
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
ARBK - NDAQ
35%
Loosely correlated
+4.35%
More