BGC
Price
$8.93
Change
+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Updated
May 20, 9:16 AM EST
72 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$82.14
Change
-$0.79 (-0.95%)
Updated
May 20, 11:12 AM EST
65 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BGC vs SF

Header iconBGC vs SF Comparison
Open Charts BGC vs SFBanner chart's image
BGC Group
Price$8.93
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Stifel Financial
Price$82.14
Change-$0.79 (-0.95%)
Volume$399
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BGC vs SF Comparison Chart

Loading...

BGCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
SFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BGC vs. SF commentary
May 20, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGC is a Hold and SF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 20, 2024
Stock price -- (BGC: $8.92 vs. SF: $82.93)
Brand notoriety: BGC and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGC: 60% vs. SF: 77%
Market capitalization -- BGC: $3.84B vs. SF: $7.95B
BGC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.84B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BGC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than BGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BGC and SF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BGC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +3.12% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15986.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

SF is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.00% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BGC with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for SF with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($7.95B) has a higher market cap than BGC($3.84B). BGC has higher P/E ratio than SF: BGC (109.29) vs SF (18.06). BGC YTD gains are higher at: 23.720 vs. SF (20.593). SF has less debt than BGC: SF (1.18B) vs BGC (1.34B). SF has higher revenues than BGC: SF (4.29B) vs BGC (1.98B).
BGCSFBGC / SF
Capitalization3.84B7.95B48%
EBITDA215MN/A-
Gain YTD23.72020.593115%
P/E Ratio109.2918.06605%
Revenue1.98B4.29B46%
Total Cash656MN/A-
Total Debt1.34B1.18B114%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGC vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
BGC
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3516
SMR RATING
1..100
8610
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1919
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGC's Valuation (54) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as SF (78) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BGC’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BGC (35) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to BGC’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BGC (86) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SF’s stock grew significantly faster than BGC’s over the last 12 months.

BGC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as SF (42) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BGC’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

BGC's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as SF (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BGC’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BGCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
SFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSPM36.450.21
+0.58%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Matrls ETF
DTD70.950.12
+0.17%
WisdomTree US Total Dividend ETF
ENTR15.28N/A
N/A
ERShares Entrepreneur ETF
GRN27.50-0.11
-0.42%
iPath® Series B Carbon ETN
BIB57.05-0.44
-0.77%
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology

BGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGC has been loosely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGC
1D Price
Change %
BGC100%
-0.11%
EVR - BGC
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
SF - BGC
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
PIPR - BGC
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
JEF - BGC
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
RJF - BGC
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
More