It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HIMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRXMD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TDOC’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HIMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDOC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
HIMS (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -9.92% price change this week, while RXMD (@Drugstore Chains) price change was +16.48% , and TDOC (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated -1.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.84%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Drugstore Chains industry was +12.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.10%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.81%.
HIMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2024.
RXMD is expected to report earnings on Aug 15, 2023.
TDOC is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2024.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Drugstore Chains (+12.54% weekly)The drugstore chains industry includes stores that sell medicines (both prescription and non-prescription), health, beauty and personal care products. Over time, many pharmacy retail chains have launched their own pharmacy benefits management services. Since demand for medical products is typically less sensitive to economic cycles, drugstore retail chains industry could be largely considered as non-cyclical. CVS Health Corporation, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation are some of the biggest operators in this industry.
@Packaged Software (+1.06% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
HIMS | RXMD | TDOC | |
Capitalization | 3.31B | 19.7M | 2.52B |
EBITDA | -19.94M | -8.77M | 154M |
Gain YTD | 26.517 | -34.713 | -40.696 |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 80.00 | N/A |
Revenue | 872M | 10.1M | 2.6B |
Total Cash | 221M | 2.23M | 1.12B |
Total Debt | 9.95M | 3.01M | 1.59B |
RXMD | TDOC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TDOC's Valuation (25) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RXMD (74) in the null industry. This means that TDOC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RXMD’s over the last 12 months.
TDOC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as RXMD (100) in the null industry. This means that TDOC’s stock grew similarly to RXMD’s over the last 12 months.
TDOC's SMR Rating (93) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as RXMD (97) in the null industry. This means that TDOC’s stock grew similarly to RXMD’s over the last 12 months.
RXMD's Price Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as TDOC (88) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that RXMD’s stock grew similarly to TDOC’s over the last 12 months.
RXMD's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TDOC (100) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that RXMD’s stock grew significantly faster than TDOC’s over the last 12 months.
HIMS | TDOC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 4 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago77% | 3 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 9 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HIMS and COTY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HIMS and COTY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HIMS | 100% | -8.01% | ||
COTY - HIMS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
SKIN - HIMS | 31% Poorly correlated | +4.02% | ||
HELE - HIMS | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.66% | ||
IPAR - HIMS | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
SPB - HIMS | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDOC has been loosely correlated with COMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TDOC jumps, then COMP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TDOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TDOC | 100% | -1.62% | ||
COMP - TDOC | 58% Loosely correlated | +6.31% | ||
COIN - TDOC | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.45% | ||
HOOD - TDOC | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
AMWL - TDOC | 53% Loosely correlated | +9.55% | ||
AMPL - TDOC | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
More |