CL
Price
$94.09
Change
+$0.61 (+0.65%)
Updated
May 9, 6:59 PM EST
77 days until earnings call
GS
Price
$455.78
Change
+$8.73 (+1.95%)
Updated
May 9, 6:59 PM EST
66 days until earnings call
GSBD
Price
$15.62
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
May 9, 6:59 PM EST
83 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CL or GS or GSBD

Header iconCL vs GS vs GSBD Comparison
Open Charts CL vs GS vs GSBDBanner chart's image
Colgate-Palmolive
Price$94.09
Change+$0.61 (+0.65%)
Volume$1.84M
CapitalizationN/A
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$455.78
Change+$8.73 (+1.95%)
Volume$773.89K
CapitalizationN/A
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$15.62
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Volume$249.5K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CL vs GS vs GSBD Comparison Chart
CLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
GSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
GSBDDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 10, 2024
Stock price -- (CL: $94.08GS: $455.56GSBD: $15.63)
Brand notoriety: CL and GS are notable and GSBD is not notable
CL represents the Household/Personal Care industry, GS is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry, and GSBD is in the Investment Managers industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CL: 106%, GS: 114%, GSBD: 79%
Market capitalization -- CL: $74.02B, GS: $134.2B, GSBD: $1.64B
CL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $74.02B. GS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $134.2B. GSBD [@Investment Managers] has a market capitalization of $1.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $23.24B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.59B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $5.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGS’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and GSBD’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • GSBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the long-term than GSBD, which in turn is a better option than CL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and GSBD’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSBD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CL is a better buy in the short-term than GS, which in turn is a better option than GSBD.

Price Growth

CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.31% , and GSBD (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +1.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.97%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17087.79%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

CL is expected to report earnings on Jul 26, 2024.

GS is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2024.

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.80% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.76% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Investment Managers (+2.50% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for CL with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for GS with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for GSBD with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($134B) has a higher market cap than CL($74B) and GSBD($1.64B). CL has higher P/E ratio than GS and GSBD: CL (32.15) vs GS (18.08) and GSBD (8.29). GS and CL YTD gains are higher at: 18.928 and 18.733 vs. GSBD (9.916). GSBD has less debt than CL and GS: GSBD (1.83B) vs CL (9.06B) and GS (333B). GS has higher revenues than CL and GSBD: GS (46.3B) vs CL (19.5B) and GSBD (208M).
CLGSGSBD
Capitalization74B134B1.64B
EBITDA4.25BN/AN/A
Gain YTD18.73318.9289.916
P/E Ratio32.1518.088.29
Revenue19.5B46.3B208M
Total Cash966MN/A76.6M
Total Debt9.06B333B1.83B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CL vs GS vs GSBD: Fundamental Ratings
CL
GS
GSBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
252630
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
111158
SMR RATING
1..100
9515
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
201045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
842397
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSBD's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GS (94) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (97) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that GSBD's stock grew significantly faster than GS’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CL (11) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for GSBD (58) in the null industry. This means that GS's stock grew similarly to CL’s and somewhat faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CL (9) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as GSBD (15) in the null industry. This means that GS's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CL (20) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for GSBD (45) in the null industry. This means that GS's stock grew similarly to CL’s and somewhat faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GS's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (84) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for GSBD (97) in the null industry. This means that GS's stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s and significantly faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLGSGSBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
GSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
GSBDDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QUAD4.810.14
+3.00%
QUAD/GRAPHICS
LNG157.781.08
+0.69%
Cheniere Energy
BV12.310.05
+0.41%
BrightView Holdings
NCNO30.81-0.08
-0.26%
nCino
GTEC1.51-0.01
-0.66%
Greenland Technologies Holding Corp

GS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GS
1D Price
Change %
GS100%
+1.93%
MS - GS
75%
Closely correlated
+2.58%
JEF - GS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
SF - GS
66%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
PIPR - GS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
EVR - GS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
More

GSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBD has been closely correlated with TSLX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBD jumps, then TSLX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBD
1D Price
Change %
GSBD100%
+0.13%
TSLX - GSBD
73%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
MFIC - GSBD
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
CGBD - GSBD
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
TCPC - GSBD
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
CCAP - GSBD
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
More