How to Compare AMS or CMS or NGS
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and NGS’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and NGS’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -6.31% price change this week, while CMS (@Electric Utilities) price change was +3.74% , and NGS (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price fluctuated -5.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.99%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.31%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -3.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2024.
CMS is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.
NGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.34% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
@Electric Utilities (+2.10% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-3.28% weekly)The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
| AMS | CMS | NGS | |
| Capitalization | 18.5M | 17.9B | 242M |
| EBITDA | 7.01M | 2.78B | 31.4M |
| Gain YTD | 24.821 | 6.989 | 39.241 |
| P/E Ratio | 41.86 | 19.93 | 112.50 |
| Revenue | 20.7M | 7.46B | 107M |
| Total Cash | 14.5M | 227M | 197K |
| Total Debt | 13.4M | 15.6B | 128M |
AMS | CMS | NGS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 53 Fair valued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 40 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 65 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 33 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 83 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a | 32 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMS's Valuation (53) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as AMS (63) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for NGS (89) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CMS's stock grew similarly to AMS’s and somewhat faster than NGS’s over the last 12 months.
CMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as NGS (63) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for AMS (83) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that CMS's stock grew similarly to NGS’s and somewhat faster than AMS’s over the last 12 months.
CMS's SMR Rating (65) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as AMS (88) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry, and is in the same range as NGS (89) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CMS's stock grew similarly to AMS’s and similarly to NGS’s over the last 12 months.
CMS's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as NGS (37) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry, and is in the same range as AMS (47) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that CMS's stock grew similarly to NGS’s and similarly to AMS’s over the last 12 months.
AMS's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMS (83) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for NGS (85) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that AMS's stock grew significantly faster than CMS’s and significantly faster than NGS’s over the last 12 months.
| AMS | CMS | NGS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A | 4 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 51% | 13 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 66% | 21 days ago 46% | 7 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | N/A | 4 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 37% | 4 days ago 70% |
AMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMS and SEM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMS and SEM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMS | 100% | +1.33% | ||
| SEM - AMS | 23% Poorly correlated | +10.47% | ||
| BKD - AMS | 23% Poorly correlated | +4.17% | ||
| PNTG - AMS | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.94% | ||
| BACK - AMS | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.21% | ||
| ADUS - AMS | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||
CMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMS has been closely correlated with WEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMS jumps, then WEC could also see price increases.
NGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NGS has been loosely correlated with WTTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NGS jumps, then WTTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGS | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| WTTR - NGS | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| AROC - NGS | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| DRQ - NGS | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| OII - NGS | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| RES - NGS | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.27% | ||
More | ||||