FAF
Price
$56.01
Change
+$0.23 (+0.41%)
Updated
May 10, 6:59 PM EST
73 days until earnings call
FDP
Price
$24.47
Change
+$0.10 (+0.41%)
Updated
May 10, 6:59 PM EST
80 days until earnings call
FDS
Price
$439.18
Change
+$3.01 (+0.69%)
Updated
May 10, 6:59 PM EST
44 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FAF or FDP or FDS

Header iconFAF vs FDP vs FDS Comparison
Open Charts FAF vs FDP vs FDSBanner chart's image
First American Financial
Price$56.01
Change+$0.23 (+0.41%)
Volume$131.85K
CapitalizationN/A
Fresh Del Monte Produce
Price$24.47
Change+$0.10 (+0.41%)
Volume$29.85K
CapitalizationN/A
Factset Research Systems
Price$439.18
Change+$3.01 (+0.69%)
Volume$27.83K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FAF vs FDP vs FDS Comparison Chart
FAFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
FDPDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
FDSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 12, 2024
Stock price -- (FAF: $56.01FDP: $24.47FDS: $439.16)
Brand notoriety: FAF, FDP and FDS are all not notable
FAF represents the Specialty Insurance industry, FDP is part of the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry, and FDS is in the Investment Banks/Brokers industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAF: 66%, FDP: 82%, FDS: 59%
Market capitalization -- FAF: $6.16B, FDP: $1.23B, FDS: $16.87B
FAF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $6.16B. FDP’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $1.23B. FDS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] has a market capitalization of $16.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.01B. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.37B. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $10.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFDP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and FDS’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FDP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the long-term than FAF, which in turn is a better option than FDP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FDP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and FDS’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FDP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the short-term than FDP, which in turn is a better option than FAF.

Price Growth

FAF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +3.00% price change this week, while FDP (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -0.20% , and FDS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price fluctuated +2.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.01%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.88%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +9.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17088.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAF is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2024.

FDP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

FDS is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (+3.56% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.26% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+9.77% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FAF with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FDP with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FDS with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDS($16.9B) has a higher market cap than FAF($6.16B) and FDP($1.23B). FDS has higher P/E ratio than FAF and FDP: FDS (35.83) vs FAF (28.86) and FDP (10.18). FDP YTD gains are higher at: -5.809 vs. FDS (-7.747) and FAF (-12.279). FAF has more cash in the bank: 3.66B vs. FDP (33.8M) and FDS (28.4M). FDP has less debt than FDS and FAF: FDP (598M) vs FDS (1.77B) and FAF (2.19B). FAF has higher revenues than FDP and FDS: FAF (6B) vs FDP (4.32B) and FDS (2.12B).
FAFFDPFDS
Capitalization6.16B1.23B16.9B
EBITDAN/A125M805M
Gain YTD-12.279-5.809-7.747
P/E Ratio28.8610.1835.83
Revenue6B4.32B2.12B
Total Cash3.66B33.8M28.4M
Total Debt2.19B598M1.77B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAF vs FDP vs FDS: Fundamental Ratings
FAF
FDP
FDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
647324
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
689821
SMR RATING
1..100
959034
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
565756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
628557
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDP's Valuation (18) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FAF (27) in the Specialty Insurance industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for FDS (93) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that FDP's stock grew similarly to FAF’s and significantly faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAF (68) in the Specialty Insurance industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for FDP (98) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that FDS's stock grew somewhat faster than FAF’s and significantly faster than FDP’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's SMR Rating (34) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDP (90) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FAF (95) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that FDS's stock grew somewhat faster than FDP’s and somewhat faster than FAF’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FAF (56) in the Specialty Insurance industry, and is in the same range as FDP (57) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that FDS's stock grew similarly to FAF’s and similarly to FDP’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FAF (62) in the Specialty Insurance industry, and is in the same range as FDP (85) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that FDS's stock grew similarly to FAF’s and similarly to FDP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAFFDPFDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FAFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
FDPDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
FDSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EEMD19.140.14
+0.73%
AAM S&P Emerging Markets Hi Div Val ETF
SNAV29.120.08
+0.28%
Mohr Sector Nav ETF
DEUS50.820.13
+0.27%
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
FOCT40.870.01
+0.03%
FT Cboe Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Oct
FNGU328.43-0.24
-0.07%
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ 3X Leveraged ETN

FAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAF has been closely correlated with FNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAF jumps, then FNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAF
1D Price
Change %
FAF100%
+0.43%
FNF - FAF
74%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
ESNT - FAF
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
RDN - FAF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MTG - FAF
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
NMIH - FAF
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
More