It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFDP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and FDS’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FDP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and FDS’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FAF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +3.00% price change this week, while FDP (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -0.20% , and FDS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price fluctuated +2.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.01%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.88%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +9.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17088.49%.
FAF is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2024.
FDP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.
FDS is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2024.
Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.26% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+9.77% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
FAF | FDP | FDS | |
Capitalization | 6.16B | 1.23B | 16.9B |
EBITDA | N/A | 125M | 805M |
Gain YTD | -12.279 | -5.809 | -7.747 |
P/E Ratio | 28.86 | 10.18 | 35.83 |
Revenue | 6B | 4.32B | 2.12B |
Total Cash | 3.66B | 33.8M | 28.4M |
Total Debt | 2.19B | 598M | 1.77B |
FAF | FDP | FDS | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 73 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 18 Undervalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 98 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 90 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 57 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 85 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FDP's Valuation (18) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FAF (27) in the Specialty Insurance industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for FDS (93) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that FDP's stock grew similarly to FAF’s and significantly faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAF (68) in the Specialty Insurance industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for FDP (98) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that FDS's stock grew somewhat faster than FAF’s and significantly faster than FDP’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's SMR Rating (34) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDP (90) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FAF (95) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that FDS's stock grew somewhat faster than FDP’s and somewhat faster than FAF’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FAF (56) in the Specialty Insurance industry, and is in the same range as FDP (57) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that FDS's stock grew similarly to FAF’s and similarly to FDP’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FAF (62) in the Specialty Insurance industry, and is in the same range as FDP (85) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that FDS's stock grew similarly to FAF’s and similarly to FDP’s over the last 12 months.
FAF | FDP | FDS | |
---|---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago57% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago54% | 5 days ago66% | 5 days ago49% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago72% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | N/A | 3 days ago57% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDP has been loosely correlated with DOLE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDP jumps, then DOLE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FDP | 100% | +0.49% | ||
DOLE - FDP | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
ADM - FDP | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
ALCO - FDP | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.46% | ||
LMNR - FDP | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
BG - FDP | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with MSCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MSCI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FDS | 100% | +0.73% | ||
MSCI - FDS | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
SPGI - FDS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
MCO - FDS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
MORN - FDS | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
VOYA - FDS | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.01% | ||
More |