ENB
Price
$37.79
Change
+$0.42 (+1.12%)
Updated
May 10, 9:07 AM EST
Earnings call today
FTS
Price
$41.32
Change
+$0.31 (+0.76%)
Updated
May 10, 9:13 AM EST
82 days until earnings call
XOM
Price
$118.52
Change
+$0.05 (+0.04%)
Updated
May 10, 9:58 AM EST
77 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ENB or FTS or XOM

Header iconENB vs FTS vs XOM Comparison
Open Charts ENB vs FTS vs XOMBanner chart's image
Enbridge
Price$37.79
Change+$0.42 (+1.12%)
Volume$6.63K
CapitalizationN/A
Fortis
Price$41.32
Change+$0.31 (+0.76%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Exxon Mobil
Price$118.52
Change+$0.05 (+0.04%)
Volume$13.18K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ENB vs FTS vs XOM Comparison Chart
ENBDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
FTSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
XOMDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 10, 2024
Stock price -- (ENB: $37.36FTS: $41.03XOM: $118.44)
Brand notoriety: ENB and FTS are not notable and XOM is notable
ENB represents the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry, FTS is part of the Electric Utilities industry, and XOM is in the Integrated Oil industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ENB: 90%, FTS: 73%, XOM: 91%
Market capitalization -- ENB: $76.58B, FTS: $19.48B, XOM: $461.22B
ENB [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $76.58B. FTS’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $19.48B. XOM [@Integrated Oil] has a market capitalization of $461.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $9.8B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.03B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $61.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ENB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and XOM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ENB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, XOM is a better buy in the long-term than ENB, which in turn is a better option than FTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ENB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and XOM’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ENB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • XOM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ENB is a better buy in the short-term than FTS and XOM.

Price Growth

ENB (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +2.58% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was +3.14% , and XOM (@Integrated Oil) price fluctuated +1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +3.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.78%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +2.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.96%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +3.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

ENB is expected to report earnings on Aug 02, 2024.

FTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

XOM is expected to report earnings on Jul 26, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+3.91% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

@Electric Utilities (+2.93% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

@Integrated Oil (+3.67% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for ENB with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FTS with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for XOM with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XOM($461B) has a higher market cap than ENB($76.6B) and FTS($19.5B). FTS and ENB has higher P/E ratio than XOM: FTS (17.13) and ENB (17.05) vs XOM (13.16). XOM YTD gains are higher at: 19.565 vs. ENB (3.720) and FTS (-0.243). XOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 74.3B vs. ENB (16.3B) and FTS (5.15B). XOM has more cash in the bank: 31.5B vs. ENB (5.9B) and FTS (625M). FTS has less debt than XOM and ENB: FTS (30B) vs XOM (41.6B) and ENB (81.2B). XOM has higher revenues than ENB and FTS: XOM (335B) vs ENB (43.6B) and FTS (11.5B).
ENBFTSXOM
Capitalization76.6B19.5B461B
EBITDA16.3B5.15B74.3B
Gain YTD3.720-0.24319.565
P/E Ratio17.0517.1313.16
Revenue43.6B11.5B335B
Total Cash5.9B625M31.5B
Total Debt81.2B30B41.6B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ENB vs FTS vs XOM: Fundamental Ratings
ENB
FTS
XOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
302665
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
635420
SMR RATING
1..100
688051
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
495549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
957214
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a4213

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ENB's Valuation (9) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as FTS (37) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for XOM (92) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that ENB's stock grew similarly to FTS’s and significantly faster than XOM’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (54) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ENB (63) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that XOM's stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s and somewhat faster than ENB’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's SMR Rating (51) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as ENB (68) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry, and is in the same range as FTS (80) in the null industry. This means that XOM's stock grew similarly to ENB’s and similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as ENB (49) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry, and is in the same range as FTS (55) in the null industry. This means that XOM's stock grew similarly to ENB’s and similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (72) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for ENB (95) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that XOM's stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s and significantly faster than ENB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ENBFTSXOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ENBDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
FTSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
XOMDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZETA15.800.23
+1.48%
Zeta Global Holdings Corp
WWD179.301.16
+0.65%
Woodward
PHAT10.09-0.01
-0.10%
Phathom Pharmaceuticals
EPSN5.30-0.04
-0.75%
Epsilon Energy Ltd
BURU0.14-0.01
-5.02%
Nuburu

ENB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENB has been closely correlated with PBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENB jumps, then PBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENB
1D Price
Change %
ENB100%
+0.35%
PBA - ENB
74%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
KMI - ENB
70%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
TRP - ENB
68%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
WMB - ENB
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
PAA - ENB
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More

FTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been closely correlated with OGE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then OGE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTS
1D Price
Change %
FTS100%
+1.53%
OGE - FTS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.19%
LNT - FTS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
ETR - FTS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
ED - FTS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
SO - FTS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
More

XOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOM has been closely correlated with CVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOM jumps, then CVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XOM
1D Price
Change %
XOM100%
+1.97%
CVX - XOM
82%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
SU - XOM
70%
Closely correlated
+2.82%
IMO - XOM
68%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
CVE - XOM
68%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
BP - XOM
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
More