Compare predictions FICO vs TAP
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICO is a Hold and TAP is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFICO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- TAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FICO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FICO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FICO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FICO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.62% price change this week, while TAP (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was -10.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.34%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
FICO is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.
TAP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-0.60% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Beverages: Alcoholic (-0.44% weekly)The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
| FICO | TAP | FICO / TAP | |
| Capitalization | 31.1B | 14.3B | 217% |
| EBITDA | 676M | 2.17B | 31% |
| Gain YTD | -2.636 | -5.171 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 70.12 | 15.41 | 455% |
| Revenue | 1.55B | 11.7B | 13% |
| Total Cash | 160M | 869M | 18% |
| Total Debt | 1.99B | 6.27B | 32% |
TAP | FICO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TAP's Valuation (25) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FICO (90) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FICO’s over the last 12 months.
FICO's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for TAP (79) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew significantly faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.
FICO's SMR Rating (11) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for TAP (81) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew significantly faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.
FICO's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TAP (53) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.
FICO's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAP (99) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.
| FICO | TAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | 10 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 60% | 6 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 67% |
FICO and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICO has been loosely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FICO jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FICO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FICO | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| NOW - FICO | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.86% | ||
| SNPS - FICO | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| CDNS - FICO | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| DSGX - FICO | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| COIN - FICO | 45% Loosely correlated | -6.52% | ||
More | ||||
TAP and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAP has been loosely correlated with STZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAP jumps, then STZ could also see price increases.