FAT
Price
$7.36
Change
-$0.03 (-0.41%)
Updated
May 3, 6:59 PM EST
87 days until earnings call
FATBB
Price
$6.17
Change
-$0.28 (-4.34%)
Updated
May 3, 6:59 PM EST
Ad is loading...

Analysis and predictions FAT vs FATBB

Header iconFAT vs FATBB Comparison
Open Charts FAT vs FATBBBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$7.36
Change-$0.03 (-0.41%)
Volume$1.94K
CapitalizationN/A
FAT Brands
Price$6.17
Change-$0.28 (-4.34%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FAT vs FATBB Comparison Chart

Loading...

FATDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
FAT vs. FATBB commentary
May 06, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a Buy and FATBB is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 06, 2024
Stock price -- (FAT: $7.36 vs. FATBB: $6.00)
Brand notoriety: FAT and FATBB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAT: 27% vs. FATBB: 233%
Market capitalization -- FAT: $123.41M vs. FATBB: $123.41M
FAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $123.41M. FATBB’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $123.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $194.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFATBB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FATBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FAT is a better buy in the long-term than FATBB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.24% price change this week, while FATBB (@Restaurants) price change was -0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.

FATBB is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.30% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FAT with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FATBB with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAT($123M) and FATBB($123M) have the same market capitalization . FAT YTD gains are higher at: 23.350 vs. FATBB (11.108).
FATFATBBFAT / FATBB
Capitalization123M123M100%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.35011.108210%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FATDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIATX28.140.41
+1.48%
Fidelity Advisor Intl Cap App M
KTRCX9.600.09
+0.95%
DWS Global Income Builder C
NMGAX16.340.11
+0.68%
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth A
REAYX24.770.13
+0.53%
Russell Inv Equity Income Y
VHDIX10.750.04
+0.37%
Voya US High Dividend Low Volatility I

FAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FAT and ARCO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FAT and ARCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAT
1D Price
Change %
FAT100%
-0.41%
ARCO - FAT
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.49%
BDL - FAT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RRGB - FAT
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
BROS - FAT
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
BLMN - FAT
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
More

FATBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBB and GTIM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBB and GTIM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBB
1D Price
Change %
FATBB100%
N/A
GTIM - FATBB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHAK - FATBB
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
PBPB - FATBB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
CNNE - FATBB
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
FAT - FATBB
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
More