CX
Price
$8.11
Change
-$0.17 (-2.06%)
Updated
Apr 29, 6:59 PM EST
86 days until earnings call
GS
Price
$430.87
Change
+$3.50 (+0.82%)
Updated
Apr 29, 6:59 PM EST
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Analysis and predictions CX vs GS

Header iconCX vs GS Comparison
Open Charts CX vs GSBanner chart's image
Cemex SAB de CV
Price$8.11
Change-$0.17 (-2.06%)
Volume$5.51M
CapitalizationN/A
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$430.87
Change+$3.50 (+0.82%)
Volume$699.57K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CX vs GS Comparison Chart

Loading...

CXDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
GSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
CX vs. GS commentary
Apr 30, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a Hold and GS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 30, 2024
Stock price -- (CX: $8.27 vs. GS: $427.57)
Brand notoriety: CX and GS are both notable
CX represents the Construction Materials, while GS is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 57% vs. GS: 98%
Market capitalization -- CX: $13.14B vs. GS: $134.2B
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $13.14B. GS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $134.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.24B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileCX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the long-term than CX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the short-term than CX.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а +3.50% price change this week, while GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.60%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17282.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.

GS is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.75% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.50% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for CX with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for GS with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($134B) has a higher market cap than CX($13.1B). CX has higher P/E ratio than GS: CX (73.74) vs GS (18.08). GS YTD gains are higher at: 11.621 vs. CX (6.710). CX has less debt than GS: CX (9.16B) vs GS (333B). GS has higher revenues than CX: GS (46.3B) vs CX (17B).
CXGSCX / GS
Capitalization13.1B134B10%
EBITDA1.72BN/A-
Gain YTD6.71011.62158%
P/E Ratio73.7418.08408%
Revenue17B46.3B37%
Total Cash533MN/A-
Total Debt9.16B333B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS vs CX: Fundamental Ratings
GS
CX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1246
SMR RATING
1..100
585
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
275
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CX's Valuation (86) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as GS (94) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CX (46) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for CX (85) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GS’s stock grew significantly faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CX (46) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as GS (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CXDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
GSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGEM25.306.05
+31.43%
Cullinan Therapeutics
PLUR5.360.46
+9.33%
Pluri
DY142.761.81
+1.28%
Dycom Industries
BMRC15.440.01
+0.06%
Bank of Marin Bancorp
SE62.860.03
+0.05%
Sea Limited

CX and Stocks

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CX
1D Price
Change %
CX100%
+1.10%
CRH - CX
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
EXP - CX
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
SUM - CX
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
MLM - CX
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
VMC - CX
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
More

GS and Stocks

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GS
1D Price
Change %
GS100%
+1.79%
MS - GS
75%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
JEF - GS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
SF - GS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
PIPR - GS
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
EVR - GS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More