CLS
Price
$43.43
Change
+$0.19 (+0.44%)
Updated
Apr 26, 6:59 PM EST
87 days until earnings call
SELF
Price
$4.28
Change
+$0.07 (+1.66%)
Updated
Apr 26, 6:59 PM EST
17 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare predictions CLS vs SELF

Header iconCLS vs SELF Comparison
Open Charts CLS vs SELFBanner chart's image
Celestica
Price$43.43
Change+$0.19 (+0.44%)
Volume$1.25M
CapitalizationN/A
Global Self Storage
Price$4.28
Change+$0.07 (+1.66%)
Volume$5.84K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CLS vs SELF Comparison Chart

Loading...

CLSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
SELFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
CLS vs. SELF commentary
Apr 28, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLS is a Hold and SELF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2024
Stock price -- (CLS: $43.46 vs. SELF: $4.26)
Brand notoriety: CLS and SELF are both not notable
CLS represents the Electronic Components, while SELF is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLS: 143% vs. SELF: 44%
Market capitalization -- CLS: $5.16B vs. SELF: $49.6M
CLS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $5.16B. SELF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $49.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $405.92B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $4.82B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSELF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SELF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the long-term than SELF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SELF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SELF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SELF is a better buy in the short-term than CLS.

Price Growth

CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +6.70% price change this week, while SELF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.87%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLS is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2024.

SELF is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+2.46% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.86% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for CLS with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for SELF with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLS($5.16B) has a higher market cap than SELF($49.6M). SELF has higher P/E ratio than CLS: SELF (17.15) vs CLS (16.22). CLS YTD gains are higher at: 48.429 vs. SELF (-6.492). CLS has more cash in the bank: 367M vs. SELF (6.92M). SELF has less debt than CLS: SELF (16.9M) vs CLS (783M).
CLSSELFCLS / SELF
Capitalization5.16B49.6M10,409%
EBITDAN/A5.42M-
Gain YTD48.429-6.492-746%
P/E Ratio16.2217.1595%
RevenueN/A12.2M-
Total Cash367M6.92M5,302%
Total Debt783M16.9M4,633%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLS vs SELF: Fundamental Ratings
CLS
SELF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
338
SMR RATING
1..100
6082
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3671
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1787
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SELF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLS (60) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SELF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SELF (38) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SELF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's SMR Rating (60) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SELF (82) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to SELF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SELF (71) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SELF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for SELF (87) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew significantly faster than SELF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSSELF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
SELFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCEN22.100.18
+0.82%
IQ Clean Oceans ETF
PIZ33.600.16
+0.48%
Invesco DW Developed Markets Momt ETF
BUFF41.430.12
+0.29%
Innovator Laddered Allc Pwr Bfr ETF™
IBDR23.70N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corp ETF
GDXD2.47-0.05
-1.98%
MicroSectors™ Gold Mns 3X Inv Lvrgd ETN

CLS and Stocks

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLS has been loosely correlated with FN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLS jumps, then FN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLS
1D Price
Change %
CLS100%
+0.49%
FN - CLS
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
JBL - CLS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
APH - CLS
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
TTMI - CLS
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.37%
TEL - CLS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
More

SELF and Stocks

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SELF and DBRG have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SELF and DBRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SELF
1D Price
Change %
SELF100%
+1.43%
DBRG - SELF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
NYMT - SELF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
IVR - SELF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
IRT - SELF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
TWO - SELF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
More