Compare trend and price IFS vs IRS
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFS is a StrongSell and IRS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IRS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- IRS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- IFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IFS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IRS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- IRS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
IFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.87% price change this week, while IRS (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.68%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
IFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2024.
IRS is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.62% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
@Real Estate Development (+0.33% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| IFS | IRS | IFS / IRS | |
| Capitalization | 2.77B | 859M | 323% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 240B | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.822 | 10.000 | -18% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.76 | 3.67 | 266% |
| Revenue | 6.82B | 94.5B | 7% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 118B | - |
| Total Debt | 10.4B | 326B | 3% |
IRS | IFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 7 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IRS's Valuation (2) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFS (38) in the null industry. This means that IRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFS’s over the last 12 months.
IRS's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as IFS (100) in the null industry. This means that IRS’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.
IFS's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as IRS (34) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to IRS’s over the last 12 months.
IRS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as IFS (58) in the null industry. This means that IRS’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.
IFS's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as IRS (33) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to IRS’s over the last 12 months.
| IFS | IRS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 82% |
IFS and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFS | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| BAP - IFS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| SBNY - IFS | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BSAC - IFS | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| MCB - IFS | 26% Poorly correlated | +3.05% | ||
| RRBI - IFS | 26% Poorly correlated | +3.21% | ||
More | ||||
IRS and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IRS has been loosely correlated with CRESY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IRS jumps, then CRESY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRS | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| CRESY - IRS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| VMI - IRS | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.42% | ||
| BBU - IRS | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
| OPEN - IRS | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| CODI - IRS | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.73% | ||
More | ||||