GOLD vs UBS ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOLD is a Sell and UBS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GOLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GOLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GOLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GOLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GOLD (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.69% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was +1.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3242.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3577.54%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
GOLD is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2024.
UBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-0.82% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
@Major Banks (+1.56% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
| GOLD | UBS | GOLD / UBS | |
| Capitalization | 29.2B | 98.7B | 30% |
| EBITDA | 5.21B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.379 | -12.071 | 69% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.42 | 3.61 | 649% |
| Revenue | 11.4B | 39.4B | 29% |
| Total Cash | 4.15B | 144B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 5.22B | 378B | 1% |
GOLD | UBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GOLD's Valuation (15) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBS (53) in the Major Banks industry. This means that GOLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBS’s over the last 12 months.
UBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GOLD (66) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GOLD’s over the last 12 months.
UBS's SMR Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for GOLD (83) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew significantly faster than GOLD’s over the last 12 months.
UBS's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as GOLD (59) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to GOLD’s over the last 12 months.
UBS's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as GOLD (99) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to GOLD’s over the last 12 months.
| GOLD | UBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 37% |
GOLD and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOLD has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GOLD jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GOLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOLD | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| AEM - GOLD | 86% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| EGO - GOLD | 81% Closely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| KGC - GOLD | 79% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| PAAS - GOLD | 79% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| RGLD - GOLD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
More | ||||
UBS and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been loosely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.