Compare predictions ASRV vs TWO
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASRV is a StrongSell and TWO is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASRV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTWO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ASRV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TWO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASRV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TWO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASRV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- TWO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ASRV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -12.19% price change this week, while TWO (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +4.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
ASRV is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2024.
TWO is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.71% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.46% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| ASRV | TWO | ASRV / TWO | |
| Capitalization | 39.6M | 1.37B | 3% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -23.526 | -4.476 | 526% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.26 | 666.67 | 4% |
| Revenue | 52.4M | 31.8M | 165% |
| Total Cash | 14.4M | 1.25M | 1,148% |
| Total Debt | 116M | 1.89B | 6% |
ASRV | TWO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TWO's Valuation (4) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ASRV (19) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TWO’s stock grew similarly to ASRV’s over the last 12 months.
TWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ASRV (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TWO’s stock grew similarly to ASRV’s over the last 12 months.
ASRV's SMR Rating (85) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TWO (97) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that ASRV’s stock grew similarly to TWO’s over the last 12 months.
TWO's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ASRV (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TWO’s stock grew similarly to ASRV’s over the last 12 months.
ASRV's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for TWO (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that ASRV’s stock grew significantly faster than TWO’s over the last 12 months.
| ASRV | TWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 8 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 71% |
ASRV and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASRV and RBCAA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASRV and RBCAA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASRV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASRV | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| RBCAA - ASRV | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
| RVSB - ASRV | 28% Poorly correlated | +4.52% | ||
| MCB - ASRV | 28% Poorly correlated | +4.20% | ||
| MCBS - ASRV | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.48% | ||
| BCML - ASRV | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
More | ||||
TWO and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TWO has been closely correlated with DX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TWO jumps, then DX could also see price increases.