CCS
Price
$78.37
Change
-$3.68 (-4.49%)
Updated
Apr 25, 6:59 PM EST
96 days until earnings call
LAKE
Price
$16.69
Change
-$0.20 (-1.18%)
Updated
Apr 25, 6:59 PM EST
41 days until earnings call
ML
Price
$68.52
Change
-$1.50 (-2.14%)
Updated
Apr 25, 6:59 PM EST
Ad is loading...

Find best ticker with compare CCS or LAKE or ML

Header iconCCS vs LAKE vs ML Comparison
Open Charts CCS vs LAKE vs MLBanner chart's image
Century Communities
Price$78.37
Change-$3.68 (-4.49%)
Volume$186.53K
CapitalizationN/A
Lakeland Industries
Price$16.69
Change-$0.20 (-1.18%)
Volume$5.49K
CapitalizationN/A
MoneyLion
Price$68.52
Change-$1.50 (-2.14%)
Volume$19.55K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CCS vs LAKE vs ML Comparison Chart
CCSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
LAKEDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
MLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2024
Stock price -- (CCS: $82.14LAKE: $16.89ML: $70.15)
Brand notoriety: CCS and ML are not notable and LAKE is notable
CCS represents the Homebuilding industry, LAKE is part of the Apparel/Footwear industry, and ML is in the Packaged Software industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCS: 123%, LAKE: 115%, ML: 45%
Market capitalization -- CCS: $3.07B, LAKE: $131.98M, ML: $698.72M
CCS [@Homebuilding] is valued at $3.07B. LAKE’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $131.98M. ML [@Packaged Software] has a market capitalization of $698.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $53.71B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $140.24B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $7.37B. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $6.23B. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $10.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLAKE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and ML’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LAKE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ML’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCS is a better buy in the long-term than ML, which in turn is a better option than LAKE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAKE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and ML’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LAKE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ML’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCS is a better buy in the short-term than ML, which in turn is a better option than LAKE.

Price Growth

CCS (@Homebuilding) experienced а +3.58% price change this week, while LAKE (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was +6.90% , and ML (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated -3.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.92%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.81%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2024.

LAKE is expected to report earnings on Jun 05, 2024.

ML is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+1.17% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

@Apparel/Footwear (+1.44% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

@Packaged Software (+1.77% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for CCS with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for LAKE with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for ML with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCS($3.07B) has a higher market cap than ML($699M) and LAKE($132M). LAKE has higher P/E ratio than CCS and ML: LAKE (20.60) vs CCS (11.86) and ML (1.80). ML YTD gains are higher at: 11.900 vs. LAKE (-8.736) and CCS (-9.601). CCS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 371M vs. LAKE (11M) and ML (7.17M). CCS has more cash in the bank: 226M vs. ML (92.2M) and LAKE (4.85M). LAKE has less debt than ML and CCS: LAKE (10.7M) vs ML (190M) and CCS (1.3B). CCS has higher revenues than ML and LAKE: CCS (3.69B) vs ML (423M) and LAKE (122M).
CCSLAKEML
Capitalization3.07B132M699M
EBITDA371M11M7.17M
Gain YTD-9.601-8.73611.900
P/E Ratio11.8620.601.80
Revenue3.69B122M423M
Total Cash226M4.85M92.2M
Total Debt1.3B10.7M190M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCS vs LAKE: Fundamental Ratings
CCS
LAKE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7216
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2077
SMR RATING
1..100
6783
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
793
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCS's Valuation (35) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as LAKE (53) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CCS’s stock grew similarly to LAKE’s over the last 12 months.

CCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAKE (77) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAKE’s over the last 12 months.

CCS's SMR Rating (67) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as LAKE (83) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CCS’s stock grew similarly to LAKE’s over the last 12 months.

LAKE's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CCS (52) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that LAKE’s stock grew similarly to CCS’s over the last 12 months.

CCS's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Homebuilding industry is significantly better than the same rating for LAKE (93) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CCS’s stock grew significantly faster than LAKE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCSLAKEML
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CCSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
LAKEDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
MLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRPSX10.900.01
+0.09%
VY® T. Rowe Price Equity Income S
TILCX23.84-0.01
-0.04%
T. Rowe Price Lrg Cp Va I
RFNCX77.02-0.11
-0.14%
American Funds Fundamental Invs R3
GIZRX11.06-0.02
-0.18%
Invesco Global Infrastructure R
PEQZX23.69-0.07
-0.29%
PGIM Jennison Blend Z

CCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCS has been closely correlated with KBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCS jumps, then KBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCS
1D Price
Change %
CCS100%
-1.98%
KBH - CCS
84%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
TOL - CCS
84%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
TMHC - CCS
84%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
MHO - CCS
83%
Closely correlated
+2.47%
PHM - CCS
82%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
More