How to Compare AG or NEON or PAAS
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEON’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and PAAS’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- AG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NEON’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEON’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and PAAS’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NEON’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -14.95% price change this week, while NEON (@Electronic Components) price change was +10.14% , and PAAS (@Precious Metals) price fluctuated -2.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3279.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3528.85%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
AG is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2024.
NEON is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2024.
PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-1.25% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
@Electronic Components (+3.25% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| AG | NEON | PAAS | |
| Capitalization | 1.79B | 25.1M | 5.59B |
| EBITDA | -77.45M | N/A | 296M |
| Gain YTD | 10.179 | -28.821 | 17.666 |
| P/E Ratio | 87.72 | N/A | N/A |
| Revenue | 587M | N/A | 2.02B |
| Total Cash | 202M | N/A | N/A |
| Total Debt | 255M | N/A | N/A |
AG | NEON | PAAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 14 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 46 Fair valued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 97 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 64 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 100 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAAS's Valuation (11) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEON (46) in the Computer Communications industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for AG (82) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PAAS's stock grew somewhat faster than NEON’s and significantly faster than AG’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEON (100) in the Computer Communications industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for AG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PAAS's stock grew somewhat faster than NEON’s and somewhat faster than AG’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's SMR Rating (92) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AG (93) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as NEON (97) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that PAAS's stock grew similarly to AG’s and similarly to NEON’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AG (39) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as NEON (64) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that PAAS's stock grew similarly to AG’s and similarly to NEON’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AG (90) in the Precious Metals industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for NEON (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that PAAS's stock grew somewhat faster than AG’s and somewhat faster than NEON’s over the last 12 months.
| AG | NEON | PAAS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 79% | 19 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
NEON and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NEON and ALNT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEON and ALNT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NEON | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEON | 100% | +18.98% | ||
| ALNT - NEON | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| OSIS - NEON | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
| PLXS - NEON | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
| SANM - NEON | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| CLS - NEON | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||
PAAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with AG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then AG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAAS | 100% | +0.85% | ||
| AG - PAAS | 81% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| AEM - PAAS | 80% Closely correlated | +1.57% | ||
| MAG - PAAS | 80% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| HL - PAAS | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| GOLD - PAAS | 78% Closely correlated | +1.68% | ||
More | ||||