BLMN
Price
$23.62
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 13, 6:59 PM EST
73 days until earnings call
EAT
Price
$62.38
Change
+$1.43 (+2.35%)
Updated
May 14, 6:59 PM EST
92 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BLMN vs EAT

Header iconBLMN vs EAT Comparison
Open Charts BLMN vs EATBanner chart's image
Bloomin' Brands
Price$23.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$836.63K
CapitalizationN/A
Brinker International
Price$62.38
Change+$1.43 (+2.35%)
Volume$678.93K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BLMN vs EAT Comparison Chart

Loading...

BLMNDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
EATDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BLMN vs. EAT commentary
May 14, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMN is a Hold and EAT is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 14, 2024
Stock price -- (BLMN: $23.62 vs. EAT: $60.94)
Brand notoriety: BLMN and EAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMN: 116% vs. EAT: 109%
Market capitalization -- BLMN: $1.99B vs. EAT: $2.62B
BLMN [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.99B. EAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $195.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileEAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • EAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BLMN and EAT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the short-term than BLMN.

Price Growth

BLMN (@Restaurants) experienced а -5.37% price change this week, while EAT (@Restaurants) price change was +5.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 26, 2024.

EAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.99% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BLMN with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for EAT with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($2.62B) has a higher market cap than BLMN($1.99B). BLMN has higher P/E ratio than EAT: BLMN (35.25) vs EAT (18.08). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 41.130 vs. BLMN (-15.379).
BLMNEATBLMN / EAT
Capitalization1.99B2.62B76%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-15.37941.130-37%
P/E Ratio35.2518.08195%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A2.09B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMN vs EAT: Fundamental Ratings
BLMN
EAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5730
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6262
SMR RATING
1..100
168
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1564
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLMN's Valuation (12) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as EAT (23). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as EAT (62). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (16). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (62). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAT (64). This means that BLMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMNEAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLMNDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
EATDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMCGX15.260.12
+0.79%
Morgan Stanley Inst Discovery R6
SOAAX8.790.02
+0.23%
Spirit of America Real Estate Inc & Gr A
MSFBX34.35-0.05
-0.15%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Franchise A
RNGCX56.88-0.10
-0.18%
American Funds New Economy R3
WMMAX18.05-0.11
-0.61%
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A

BLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMN has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMN jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMN
1D Price
Change %
BLMN100%
+2.47%
CAKE - BLMN
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.93%
DRI - BLMN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
CHUY - BLMN
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
CBRL - BLMN
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
DIN - BLMN
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
More

EAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EAT has been closely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EAT jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAT
1D Price
Change %
EAT100%
+3.60%
CAKE - EAT
69%
Closely correlated
+3.93%
DRI - EAT
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
DENN - EAT
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
DIN - EAT
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
CBRL - EAT
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
More